Response to my Peers

In my first response, the points that made the most sense to me are that the jury selection process gives people judicial power, it is a way for the citizens to take part in the judicial process and it improves the probability of fairness for the accused person. The position was supported convincingly using appropriate resources.

In my second response, the points that made the most sense to me are that; the jury selection process is easily compromised by the media and the jury’s personal beliefs, (The People of the State of California vs. Orenthal James Simpson, ten jurors were discharged, some due to irregularities), the jury selection is indirect discrimination since persons are selected subject to holding certain characteristics and the jury selection should be more voluntary than mandatory (no fines should be imposed for non-participation). The position was supported convincingly using appropriate resources.

At Legal writing experts, we would be happy to assist in preparing any legal document you need. We are international lawyers and attorneys with significant experience in legal drafting, Commercial-Corporate practice and consulting. In the last few years, we have successfully undertaken similar assignments for clients from different jurisdictions. If given this opportunity, The LegalPen will be able to prepare the legal document within the shortest time possible. You can send us your quick enquiry ( here )

Verified by MonsterInsights