XXX
XXX,
XXX
XXX
Plaintiff, pro se
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF XXX IN AND FOR XXX COUNTY
COMES NOW, XXX, pro se, and files this Response to Defendants All About Speech, LLC, A Better Learning Environment, LLC, XXX, individually, and XXX, individually (collectively, “Defendants”)’s First Request for Extension to Respond to Plaintiff’s Motions. In response thereof, Plaintiff states as follows: i. Defendants must serve their response within ten days of receiving Plaintiff’s motions XXX.1(a)(3) provides for the timeline for filing a response to a motion. Said provision states in pertinent part that: “[u]nless a specific rule states otherwise, an opposing party must file any responsive memorandum within 10 days after the motion and supporting memorandum are served” (emphasis added). In the instant action Defendants were served on March 23, XXX. They now attempt to abuse this Court’s process by seeking to engage in dilatory tactics to harass Plaintiff. In response to Defendants’ request, Plaintiff asserts that the Defendants must file their response within 10 days. They have four more days to respond. ii. Defendants improperly served their Request XXX)(D) provides for service by electronic means when the parties consent to such service. Said provision states in pertinent part that a party effecting service shall serve the other party through electronic means “if the recipient consents in writing to that method of service ” Further, XXX(a) provides that each party must be served. In the instant action, the parties had already established that they could serve each other electronically via email. However, Responding Plaintiff was not served electronically. Further he was not served at all. His wife was the one who was served Via USPA. Defendants’ conduct amount to a departure from the parties’ earlier agreement to serve via email. Plaintiff asserts that Defendants’ failure to effect service on him is a tactic to harass Plaintiff, and further curtail his right(s) to access justice. |
CONCLUSION
In short, Plaintiff prays this Honorable Court denies Defendants’ Request for Extension to Respond to Plaintiffs Motions. Plaintiff also prays for any other order this Court deems just.
DATED: __________________
Respectfully submitted,
___________________
XXX
XXX
Plaintiff, Pro Se.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on [ENTER DATE], copies of the foregoing Response have been sent to all the Defendants in the following addresses:
JABURG WILK
XXX
XXX
Phoenix, XXX
XXX
LAW OFFICE OF JEFFERY SILENCE
XXX
XXX
Phoenix, XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX PLLC
XXX
Phoenix, XXX
Tel. XXX
Fax (XXX
XXX
__________________
XXX
XXX
Plaintiff, Pro Se.
At Legal writing experts, we would be happy to assist in preparing any legal document you need. We are international lawyers and attorneys with significant experience in legal drafting, Commercial-Corporate practice and consulting. In the last few years, we have successfully undertaken similar assignments for clients from different jurisdictions. If given this opportunity, The LegalPen will be able to prepare the legal document within the shortest time possible. You can send us your quick enquiry ( here )