Research Trail

Research Trail  To: From: Date: Re:  The issue(s) Whether Phantom’s claim in respect of monies due for the orders numbered 701 and 704 amounting to £62,500 plus vat is valid;Whether Titan’s counterclaim for consequential loss in respect of replacement beams amounting...

LEGAL OPINION

RE: PERSONA OPINION INTRODUCTION I am asked to advise Phantom Steel Ltd (‘Phantom’) in relation to a dispute with Titan Construction Plc (‘Titan’). Phantom wishes to claim the remainder of the price on various deliveries of steel beams made to Titan between February...

PLAINTIFFS VERIFIED COMPLAINT

PERSONS ADDRESS City, ST ZIP Code Phone | Fax Email Plaintiff in pro per IN THE 344TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT STATE OF TEXAS PERSONA,Plaintiff,vs.PERSONAS,Defendants. Case No.: NumberPLAINTIFF’S VERIFIED COMPLAINT NOW COMES PERSONA, Plaintiff, and files this Complaint...

BRANDON ROCKETTS MOTION FORSUMMARY JUDGMENT

PERSONA ADDRESS Phone | Fax Email Defendant in pro per in the county court at law no. 1 travis county, texas tom hoskins,Plaintiff,vs.brandon rockett and wyatt giles, d/b/a rock solid construction,Defendant Case No.: Number brandon rockett’s motion for summary...