Date February 17, 2021

To : Kendra Daugherty

Clermont county Public Defenders office

302 E Main St, Batavia, OH 45103

 

Eric Ohlin Haynes

C/O 3130 Leeds Road 

Amelia, Ohio 45102

Eric.haynes@mail.com

513-456-3560

 

Kendra Daugherty,

 

In order to retain your services a legal counsel, I require answers to the following questions, and sign as a guarantee you will protect my God given and constitutionally protected rights.  

 

I cannot proceed with your services or this case unless I receive these answers with positive responses. I am entitled to “effective” assistance of counsel and a fair and speedy trial. 

Therefore, I require you act swiftly to protect and guarantee those rights. Please answer the following questions in writing, and sign below thus guaranteeing them in your full commercial liability. 

 

  1. Are you familiar with all amendments in the Constitution (US and State), and will you use all of them to protect my rights? Yes / No

  2. Can you see the obvious constitutional issues and conflicting codes being charged that are present in this case?  Yes / No

 

  1. Will you guarantee protection of all the God given (natural rights), as protected in those constitutions? If there are any exceptions, please list them in an attachment.  Yes / No

 

  1. Are you familiar with courts operating in a martial law/ statutory court, and will you defend against allowing those procedures in my case? Yes / No

 

  1. Will you require the court to NOT refer to me as a “person”/ aka artificial name, thus requiring the court to refer to me as a man only as one of the people, and only using my properly syntaxed full given name. This would form a case for a personam jurisdiction challenge. Put another way, will you require the court to: provide the fact or facts in evidence that prove I am NOT a man or that proof I am an artificial person, and accepting commercial liability for this matter.  Yes / No.

 

  1. Will you challenge the statutes and codes as being martial law based set of code-rules, not having any lawful priority over the constitution?  Yes / No.

  2. Will you fully will employ the Constitution in your defense, as opposed to relying on codes and statutes? Yes / No.

  3. Will you require production of the judge’s and prosecution’s oath of office and bonds or insurance policies, and remind them of their duty to uphold my constitutional rights?
    I require you to obtain those statements on the record, and them to produce these documents signed in their individual liable commercial capacity. Yes / No.

  4. Will you research and produce any commercial instruments, securities, bonds etc being produced as associated with this case number or my name?  Yes / No.

  5. If any of these rights are denied or financial conflicts exist by the court, the prosecution, or yourself, will you require recusal of that party?  Yes / No.

  6. Will you obtain the financial records of investments of the judge and prosecution to ensure no financial conflicts of interest are involved in this case, directly or indirectly, such as Banking, bonds, or other securities which may benefit the parties holding them?  Yes / No. 

  7. Will you require the court and prosecution to not use legalese language, and require them to provide any lists of definitions I request, or require they provide a list of words and definition sources they will use. If they will not provide or answer these definition requests, I will require provide a translator for this legalese. Yes / No.

  8. Are you familiar with the fact that statutes & codes are not constitutional laws for one of “the people”, thus will you challenge and disqualify the charges based on these and other relevant case laws? see:
  • A ‘statute’ is not a Law,…Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248, 
  • A ‘code’ is not a Law,… In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261, in point of fact in Law, 
  • A concurrent or ‘joint resolution’ of legislature is not law‘,”…Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707; Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165.

  1.  Will you remove yourself from appointment as counsel, if you do not complete these reasonable tasks, and notify the court to request appointment of new counsel? Yes / No.
  2. I ______________________________ (attorney name) hereby affirm and guarantee I will stand for and protect all of these rights and issues listed above, and assume all commercial liability for the case, and will fight at any cost to guarantee a positive outcome for my client.

_________________________________ Print__________________________  ______, 2019

 

At Legal writing experts, we would be happy to assist in preparing any legal document you need. We are international lawyers and attorneys with significant experience in legal drafting, Commercial-Corporate practice and consulting. In the last few years, we have successfully undertaken similar assignments for clients from different jurisdictions. If given this opportunity, we will be able to prepare the legal document within the shortest time possible.