Brooks Mitchell
2795 Cabbage Hammock Rd.
St. Augustine, Fl 32092
Detective Kelly Vought, Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office (JSO)
The ICAC = Internet Crimes Against Children
VCSO = Volusia County Sheriff’s Office
JSO= Jacksonville Sherriff’s Office
USCG= United States Coast Guard
Detective Kelly Vought, JSO, was the key witness and chatter in this case.
Detective Lily Efird, VCSO, was the Team Leader for the 6 Chatters in this case.
Detective Joe Riley, VCSO, was the head forensic expert.
Det. Vought deliberately deleted key forensic email evidence from the ICAC Gmail account, per deposition.
Det. Vought deliberately deleted the entire ICAC Gmail account as per deposition.
Det. Vought was not in the Sting House when setting up the Gmail account and Craigs List ad. The IP address he used was in Jacksonville. He did not use the secure ICAC servers as required for all communication during the operation.
Det. Vought disobeyed the judge’s order to not use or turn on the ICAC laptop before turning it over to the defense for inspection. (Rick Green)
Det. Vought deleted over 100 ICAC case files including one with the name Brooks Mitchell and date of 3/13/2015 from the ICAC laptop just before he turned it over to defense. (Rick Green)
Det. Vought deleted the internet history from the ICAC laptop after being told not to by the judge. (Rick Green)
Det. Vought removed all the passwords from his police laptop after being told not to by the judge. (Rick Green)
Det. Vought was unable to provide his ICAC cell phone and text after the judge ordered it to be turned over to the defense. (Rick Green)
Det. Vought lied under oath about his on-duty status at 11:15PM on 03/12/2015 during text/chat, per deposition and timecard.
Det. Vought did not attend ICAC training on 3/9/2015 as stated in his deposition., per deposition.
Det. Vought did not receive or read the mandatory ICAC Operation of Standards Manual as per deposition. In fact, he had not even seen it until 3 years later at his deposition in this manner.
Det. Vought did not remember who emailed him to work this operation, per deposition
Det. Vought did not know who his ICAC TEAM LEADER was, per deposition
Det. Vought’s TEAM LEADER, Lily Efird did not know Det. Kelly Vought, per Efird deposition
Det. Lily Efird was not trained or part of the ICAC Task Force but was appointed as the TEAM LEADER
Det. Vought did not know who his ICAC supervisor was, per deposition.
Det. Vought did not submit a written police report or author any reports in this case, as per deposition
Det. Vought turned over highly sensitive and confidential information and this entire case file to the USCG without ICAC or JSO permission, per deposition.
Det. Vought was not listed to work on any personnel assignments for the Sting Operation, per signed Order of Operation.
Det. Vought did not provide the entire chat/text to the ICAC supervisor as required by Operation Standards, per deposition & Standards.
The Chain of Custody was broken by Det. Joe Riley. Det. Riley was never listed on the COC form. (COC form & Riley Depo Page 8 lines 22-25 & page 9 lines 1-25)
There is No “Affiliate Agreement” for this operation between VCSO and JSO including any agreement for Det. Kelly Vought to work the week of 3/9/2015- 3/16/2015, See FOIA request
It was never mentioned by the defense to the jury about the discrepancy between the emails entered from the State and the emails from the Craigs List Server that was deposed by the defense. The emails admitted from the State were called a fraud by the defense’s forensic expert Rick Green under sworn testimony. There is no way to authenticate the text since the ICAC cell phone has gone missing and there is no way to authenticate the email threads since Det. Vought deleted the emails and entire Gmail account. By his own words. “That account is — it’s no longer in existence.”
At Legal writing experts, we would be happy to assist in preparing any legal document you need. We are international lawyers and attorneys with significant experience in legal drafting, Commercial-Corporate practice and consulting. In the last few years, we have successfully undertaken similar assignments for clients from different jurisdictions. If given this opportunity, The LegalPen will be able to prepare the legal document within the shortest time possible. You can send us your quick enquiry ( here )