[ENTER YOUR ADDRESS]

 

Plaintiff 

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

 

ANDREW JOSEPH LAMB, an individual,

                                 Plaintiff,

     Vs.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,

                               Defendant

Case No.: 


COMPLAINT

Jury Trial Demanded 

 

Plaintiff, ANDREW JOSEPH LAMB, pro se, for his complaint against defendant U.S. Department of Defense, hereby alleges and states as follows:

I.

THE PARTIES 

  1. Plaintiff is a resident of Phoenix, Arizona. His address is [ENTER ADDRESS].
  2. Defendant is an executive branch department of the federal government charged with coordinating and supervising all agencies and functions of the government directly related to national security and the United States Armed Forces. The address for Defendant is [ENTER ADDRESS]

 

II.

JURISDICTION 

  1. This court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1331 since it involves the violations of Plaintiff’s civil rights. 

III.

VENUE

  1. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a) and (c), as Defendant 

is subject to personal jurisdiction in this state. 

IV.

JURY DEMAND

  1. Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all claims so triable.

V.

FACTS COMMON TO ALL CLAIMS

  1. Plaintiff was born in Ridgecrest, California, in 1984. 
  2. Soon after his birth, Plaintiff was adopted by the China Lake Naval research base is in Ridgecrest California. Plaintiff’s adoptive father is/was Dave Lamb, a veteran of the U.S. Navy. 
  3. Incidental and consequential to his adoption at the research base, Plaintiff is/has been a victim of the US patent 4,8777,027 v2k by Microwave induction (hereinafter referred to as “V2K”). 
  4. Below is general information on V2K: 
  1. V2K is a technology that was discovered in 1962 by Dr Allan H. Frey, and it is called the “Frey Effect.”  See Dr Allan H. Frey, “Human Auditory System Response to Modulated Electromagnetic Energy”, J Applied Physiology 17 (4): 689–92, 1962, accessible at https://journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/jappl.1962.17.4.689. 
  2. The technology can put voices in one’s head, that no one else can hear. The voice that one hears is computer generated and is typed into a computer and sent using a carrier wave signal. The CIA uses it to harass and attack Targeted Individuals worldwide.  
  3. Most of the time, the signal is sent using a microwave beam from a cell tower.  The cell tower companies, and the cell phone companies are complicit in these attacks.
  4. The CIA is experimenting on everyone, using simple, repeated statements.  About 20% – 30% of the population are highly susceptible to these messages and they are called “Highly Suggestible.”  Such people can be manipulated to say and do almost anything.
  5. The CIA uses these people on a daily basis to harass and annoy Targeted Individuals.  They targeted individuals are “highly suggestible” people, that do not know that they are being manipulated.  These people are literally in a deep trance, even while their eyes are open.
  6. The U.S army admits that V2K is real and that they are using it. See https://www.targetedjustice.com/bioeffects-of-non-lethal-weapons.html

 

  1. Defendant subjected Plaintiff to continuous mind control through V2K. 

 

  1. On or about 1988, Plaintiff sustained a car accident through/under mind control.

 

  1. On or about 1997, Plaintiff was molested in Chandler Arizona, in audible V2K.  
  2. On or about 1999, in Ensenada, Mexico, Plaintiff experienced Mind control at school. At this time, Plaintiff’s adopted mother, Sandi, sent Andrew to a Reform school. Plaintiff also experienced inaudible mind control depression and suicidal Hypnosis. 
  3. On or about 2003, in Costa Rica, Plaintiff experienced Mind control in the Academy at the Dundee Ranch, which resulted in physical conflict and rape.  The School was unaware that Plaintiff was subjected to mind control by V2K. Plaintiff also suffered migraine. 
  4. On or about December 31, 2002, in Tempe, Arizona, Plaintiff experienced mind control, which contributed to the delinquency of a minor alcohol poisoning. 
  5. On or about 2004, in Salt Lake City, Utah, Plaintiff experienced an audible mind control rape. Plaintiff abandoned a room, which he had rented with a family friend. He also abandoned his vehicle on the highway to walk to Las Vegas. 
  6. On or about 2004, in Las Vegas, Nevada, Plaintiff experienced a mind controlled physical conflict. His one-year jail time at the Clark County detention facility was dropped. Plaintiff recalls when he was in jail someone suggested by just a cold reading that Plaintiff was hearing the V2K, and he was right except Plaintiff was then unaware whether it was V2K or symptoms of Schizophrenia. 
  7. On or about 2007, in Chicago, Illinois, under the influence of Mind control via V2K, Plaintiff engaged in a sexual relationship with a woman. Plaintiff walked more than fifty miles in the Chicago Street to go to hospital. Inaudible V2K hypnosis mind Control suggested hearing a voice. The hospital transferred Plaintiff to Monroe Pavilion and Applied SSI. 
  8. On or about 2008, in Hendersonville, Tennessee, Plaintiff experienced mind-controlled rape, which led to Plaintiff excessively spending all his car accident money.
  9. On or about 2009, in Phoenix, Arizona, Plaintiff experienced mind-controlled starvation and ended up over hundred miles into Texas.
  10. On or about 2009, in Dallas, Texas, Plaintiff experienced mind-controlled starvation and walked from Arizona to El Paso to San Antonio to Austin to Dallas. Plaintiff lost 50 pounds.
  11. Around the same time, an individual in a car drove up and asked Plaintiff if he wanted to make some money. Plaintiff was purely mind controlled. He took the individual’s bad check and ended up right in jail. Once Plaintiff was in Dallas county jail cell, he heard audible mind control V2K. Notably, one year in Dallas County Jail, Plaintiff was coerced under Mind Control in the court room. 
  12. Plaintiff also experienced V2K mind control on or about 2012, in Los Angeles. 
  13. On or about 2014, in San Francisco, California, Plaintiff experienced V2K mind control until he was forced to jump off a bridge. He went into a comma and woke up after one month at Laguna Honda hospital. For the first time Plaintiff spoke to a therapist, where he engaged in an intimate conversation about the V2K mind control and his experience. 
  14. On or about 2016, in Phoenix, Arizona, Plaintiff reported his experiences with mind control attacks to Senator John McCain. Washington called Plaintiff back and denied their involvement in any mind control satellite V2K. They told Plaintiff to talk to his friend who was later attacked to keep his mouth shut.
  15. On or about 2017, in Phoenix, Arizona, Plaintiff recognized he could not talk for himself ever since he knew the V2K was audible because V2K would control his every word. In 2015 when Plaintiff was at the Social Security trying to explain his experience with mind Control, the V2K took over the conversation. 
  16. On or about 2017, V2K took over a conversation Plaintiff had with two people. V2k gave them a bet and gave several future target attacks by names, approximate times, and exactly how they would be attacked by the same tactics they used on Plaintiff. V2K also demonstrated sexual harassment in the conversation through brain wave entrainment. This causes Plaintiff to sleep, cry, or engage in sexual pleasure to wit, masturbation. 
  17. Following Plaintiff’s experiences as alleged hereinabove, Plaintiff contacted the White House, the CIA, the FBI Secret Service in Phoenix Arizona, the NSA Pentagon, and Senator John McCain. The only response Plaintiff received was a call from Washington about Plaintiff’s report to Senator McCain. Accordingly, all the agencies denied the allegations. Accordingly, Plaintiff files this suit. 

VI

CLAIMS 

 

FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Mental Torture, Pain, and/or Suffering 

In violation of Section 3(b) of the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991. 

  1. Plaintiff incorporates and realleges herein by this reference Paragraphs 1 

through 28, inclusive, as though set forth in full herein.
30. Consequential to Defendant’s operation, use, and/or authorization of V2K, Plaintiff suffered prolonged mental harm caused by the administration or application, or threatened administration or application, of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or the personality. 

  1. Notably, Plaintiff sustained traumatic brain injury when he jumped off a bridge in San Francisco and ended up in a coma; suffered sexually related trauma including molest station and rape; starvation; and repeated character assassination. 
  2. Plaintiff has made several attempts to get redress for Defendant’s action(s) or inaction(s) by contacting the White House, the CIA, the FBI Secret Service in Phoenix Arizona, the NSA Pentagon, and Senator John McCain. Unfortunately, Plaintiff received no positive response from the aforesaid. 
  3. As a matter of law, Defendant’s operation and use of V2K violates the said provision, and the human rights of Plaintiff. 

 

SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Conspiracy against Rights. 

In violation of 18 U.S. Code § 241.

  1. Plaintiff incorporates and realleges herein by this reference Paragraphs 1 

through 33, inclusive, as though set forth in full herein.

  1. Upon information and belief, Defendant conspired with unknown/unidentified individuals/agencies to injure, oppress, and intimidate Plaintiff in the free exercise or enjoyment of his rights and privilege secured to him by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
  2. In a bid to carry out experiments on the V2K, Defendant entered into an agreement/agreement with persons unknown to Plaintiff, to proceed with the experiment(s) on innocent Americans like Plaintiff. 
  3. All the actions alleged in the fact pattern disclose how Defendant’s conspiracy bore a heavy toll on Plaintiff’s experiences. 
  4. Notably, Plaintiff sustained traumatic brain injury when he jumped off a bridge in San Francisco and ended up in a coma; suffered sexually related trauma including molest station and rape; starvation; and repeated character assassination.

THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law

In violation of Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242. 

  1. Plaintiff incorporates and realleges herein by this reference Paragraphs 1 

through 38, inclusive, as though set forth in full herein.

  1. Defendant, acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully deprived or caused to be deprived from Plaintiff, rights, privileges, and/or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S. 
  2. Defendant’s actions and/or inactions caused Plaintiff to experience a lot of suffering under V2K mind control. Notably, Plaintiff sustained traumatic brain injury when he jumped off a bridge in San Francisco and ended up in a coma; suffered sexually related trauma including molest station and rape; starvation; and repeated character assassination.

FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Law Enforcement Misconduct

In violation of Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141

(Against First Defendant)

  1. Plaintiff incorporates and realleges herein by this reference Paragraphs 1 

through 41, inclusive, as though set forth in full herein.

  1. Defendant failed to investigate and enter into a court-enforceable structural reform agreement with the other Defendants who engaged in patterns or practices of systemic misconduct, violations of federal law, and unconstitutional policing.
  2. Defendant had an obligation to do an investigation on the torture consequential to Defendants’ use of V2K on innocent Americans. 
  3. Incidental to the failure by the said Defendant to do the investigation, Plaintiff sustained traumatic brain injury when he jumped off a bridge in San Francisco and ended up in a coma; suffered sexually related trauma including molest station and rape; starvation; and repeated character assassination.

FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Declaratory Judgment

Pursuant to Rule 57, Fed. R. Civ. P.

  1. Plaintiff incorporates and realleges herein by this reference Paragraphs 1 

through 45, inclusive, as though set forth in full herein.

  1. There is an actual and justiciable controversy between Plaintiff and Defendant regarding Defendant’s use of V2K and the injuries suffered by Plaintiff consequential to Defendant’s use, operation, and/or authorization of V2K. 
  2. As a matter of law, Defendant’s operation and use of V2K violates the said provision, and the human rights of Plaintiff. 
  3. Plaintiff sustained traumatic brain injury when he jumped off a bridge in San Francisco and ended up in a coma; suffered sexually related trauma including molest station and rape; starvation; and repeated character assassination.

 

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court:

  1. Issue findings of fact and conclusions of law that Defendants committed the alleged violations.
  2. Issue a judgment declaring that Defendant violated Plaintiff’s human rights as protected under the U.S. Constitution and other Statutes. 
  3. Issue a judgment declaring Defendant’s use of the V2K as unconstitutional to the extent it violates the rights of Americans.
  4. Issue a judgment ordering Defendant to compensate Plaintiff for the pain and suffering Plaintiff underwent following the use of V2K on Plaintiff, in an amount set by the Court. 
  5. Grant such additional or other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

 

DATED: 

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

                                                                                           

              

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

I hereby certify that on [ENTER DATE], copies of the foregoing Complaint have been sent to all the Defendants in the following addresses:

[ENTER ADDRESSES FOR DEFENDANTS].

    

   

 

At Legal writing experts, we would be happy to assist in preparing any legal document you need. We are international lawyers and attorneys with significant experience in legal drafting, Commercial-Corporate practice and consulting. In the last few years, we have successfully undertaken similar assignments for clients from different jurisdictions. If given this opportunity, we will be able to prepare the legal document within the shortest time possible.