Report this service

“Crafting an Effective Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment in Legal Disputes”

Service Description


An Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment is a legal document filed in response to a party’s request for a summary judgment. This opposition argues that there are disputed material facts in the case that necessitate a trial. It’s a crucial part of the pre-trial process, allowing the responding party to contest the motion and advocate for their right to a full hearing.


The requirement for this document arises when one party in a lawsuit files a Motion for Summary Judgment, claiming that there are no significant factual disputes and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The opposing party files this document to argue against that claim and demonstrate that a trial is necessary.

How to Draft

To draft an Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment:

  1. Case Information: Start with the case title, number, and the court in which the case is proceeding.
  2. Introduction: Briefly introduce the case and your position regarding the Motion for Summary Judgment.
  3. Statement of Facts: Present a detailed statement of facts, highlighting disputed facts that show a need for a trial.
  4. Legal Arguments: Contest the legal basis of the Motion for Summary Judgment. Use statutes, case law, and legal principles to support your arguments.
  5. Evidence: Reference or attach any relevant evidence that supports your claim of disputed facts. This can include witness testimonies, documents, or affidavits.
  6. Conclusion: Summarize your opposition and reiterate the necessity for the case to proceed to trial.
  7. Signature and Date: The document should be signed and dated by you or your attorney.


File the opposition with the court, adhering to the same deadlines as set for the response to the Motion for Summary Judgment. Serve a copy on the opposing party or their attorney.


An Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment is a vital tool in the litigation process, enabling parties to challenge attempts to bypass a trial. It is essential for ensuring that all material facts and legal arguments are thoroughly considered by the court before a final decision is made.