RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

XXXX

Plaintiff in pro per

XXX DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF XXXX

SEATTLE DIVISION

XXX

NOW COMES Eric Stephen Freeze, Plaintiff, and files this Response to Order to Show Cause, and hereby avers as follows:

1. The purpose of this memorandum is to present a compelling argument highlighting Jose Acuna’s integral role in violating the constitutional rights of the plaintiff, Eric Stephen Freeze. Additionally, it emphasizes the severe damages suffered by the plaintiff, making it unjust to dismiss Jose Acuna from the case.
2. The plaintiff, a self-employed procurer of scrap metal, has been wrongfully treated, and it is crucial to hold Acuna accountable for his misconduct.
3. Plaintiff Eric Stephen Freeze, a law-abiding citizen of Washington, United States, was born and raised at 47996, 47972 Moen Rd, Concrete, WA, referred to as the Property, where he has resided since birth.
4. His constitutional rights, including the Fourth Amendment right to be secure in his person, house, papers, and effects, have been infringed upon, causing significant harm and distress.
5. One of the most egregious actions committed by Jose Acuna was his involvement in conspiring with other defendants to forcibly attempt to evict the plaintiff from his home. This unlawful act, which occurred just two days after the death of the plaintiff’s father, Peter Freeze, violated the plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment rights, protecting him against unreasonable searches and seizures.
6. Acuna, without regard for the law, admitted to breaking into Plaintiff’s home, causing severe emotional distress and violating the sanctity of the plaintiff’s private space. The trauma inflicted upon the plaintiff by this heinous act cannot be overstated.
7. In addition to breaking and entering, Acuna played a pivotal role in the unlawful seizure of the plaintiff’s property. Valuable possessions, including a cherished family rifle, essential purchase paper evidence, and personal belongings, were stolen from Plaintiff’s home during this illegal action.
8. The loss of these items has not only caused financial detriment but also emotional suffering for the plaintiff. Irreplaceable sentimental objects have been callously stripped away from the plaintiff’s life, leaving a profound void that cannot be filled.
9. The plaintiff has presented compelling evidence to support the claim that the defendants, including Jose Acuna, were involved in organized crime. This includes the violation of Plaintiff’s rights and other felonious activities, falling under the purview of 18 U.S. Code § 1961–1 RICO.
10. Acuna’s active participation in organized criminal activities has caused irreparable damage to the plaintiff’s well-being, livelihood, and reputation. Such disregard for the law and fellow citizens’ rights demands strict accountability.
11. The traumatic events orchestrated by Jose Acuna and his co-conspirators have caused the plaintiff immense emotional distress and psychological trauma. The constant fear, anxiety, and sense of violation resulting from the unlawful invasion of his home have left lasting scars on the plaintiff’s mental well-being.
12. The unlawful seizure of the plaintiff’s property, including critical purchase paper evidence, has had severe financial repercussions. As a self-employed individual, the plaintiff’s livelihood heavily relies on these documents. Their absence has disrupted business operations, leading to financial hardship and endangering the plaintiff’s ability to support himself.
13. The actions orchestrated by Jose Acuna and his accomplices have left the plaintiff displaced and homeless.
14. Deprived of his home and rightful property, the plaintiff has been forced to endure the hardships of homelessness, drastically affecting his quality of life and overall well-being.
15. Given the compelling evidence of Jose Acuna’s egregious actions and his significant role in violating the plaintiff’s constitutional rights, dismissing him from the case would be a grave miscarriage of justice. The damages suffered by the plaintiff are substantial and demand accountability from all parties involved.
16. In conclusion, Jose Acuna’s pivotal role in violating the plaintiff’s constitutional rights and causing severe damages cannot be ignored. His actions, along with those of the other defendants, have left the plaintiff emotionally traumatized, financially devastated, and without a home.
17. Dismissing Jose Acuna from the case would send a distressing message that such violations can be committed with impunity.
18. To uphold justice and protect the rights of innocent citizens like Eric Stephen Freeze, it is imperative that Acuna be held accountable for his actions and face the consequences of his misconduct.

Dated this _____ day of XXXX.

Respectfully Submitted,

XXXX,

Plaintiff in pro per

At Legal writing experts, we would be happy to assist in preparing any legal document you need. We are international lawyers and attorneys with significant experience in legal drafting, Commercial-Corporate practice and consulting. In the last few years, we have successfully undertaken similar assignments for clients from different jurisdictions. If given this opportunity, The LegalPen will be able to prepare the legal document within the shortest time possible. You can send us your quick enquiry ( here )