Research Trail |
To: From: Date: Re: |
The issue(s) Whether Phantom’s claim in respect of monies due for the orders numbered 701 and 704 amounting to £62,500 plus vat is valid;Whether Titan’s counterclaim for consequential loss in respect of replacement beams amounting to £65,000 plus vat as set out in the letter from Brierley Khan solicitors dated 21 January 2022 is valid;Whether the meeting on 9th December 2021 and subsequent email sent on 10th December 2021 constituted an agreement;What were the express and implied terms of the agreement?Whether the contract was frustrated;Whether there was breach of contract; andWhich damages can Phantom Steel Limited recover? |
Research strategy adopted Issue A: Whether Phantom’s claim in respect of monies due for the orders numbered 701 and 704 amounting to £62,500 plus vat is valid Search Terms Used“injunction” and “mandatory injunction” Primary SourcesWakeham v Wood (1982) 43 P & CR 40Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting Co Ltd [1895] 1 Ch 287 Issue B: Whether Titan’s counterclaim for consequential loss in respect of replacement beams amounting to £65,000 plus vat as set out in the letter from Brierley Khan solicitors dated 21 January 2022 is valid Search Terms Used“specific performance” and “unforeseen circumstances” Primary SourcesWolverhampton Corp v Emmons [1901] 1 QB 515Johnson v Agnew [1980] AC 367 at 400 Issue C: Whether the meeting on 9th December 2021 and subsequent email sent on 10th December 2021 constituted an agreement Search Terms Used“subjective approach” Primary SourcesRTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Alois Muller Gmbh & Co. KG [2010] UKSC 14 at [45] Issue D: What were the express and implied terms of the agreement? Search Terms Used“express terms”, “implied terms” and “matrix of fact” Primary SourcesICS Ltd v West Bromwich [1998] 1 WLR 896 Issue E: Whether the contract was frustrated Search Terms Used“frustration” and “failure to perform” Primary SourcesThe Sea Angel, [2007] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 517 at [111] Issue F: Whether there was breach of contract Search Terms Used“breach” and “obligations” Issue G: Which damages can Phantom Steel Limited recover? Search Terms Used“damages” Primary SourcesWatts v Morrow [1991] 1 WLR 1421, 1445Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2001] 2 WLR 72 Word Count: 386 |
At Legal writing experts, we would be happy to assist in preparing any legal document you need. We are international lawyers and attorneys with significant experience in legal drafting, Commercial-Corporate practice and consulting. In the last few years, we have successfully undertaken similar assignments for clients from different jurisdictions. If given this opportunity, The LegalPen will be able to prepare the legal document within the shortest time possible. You can send us your quick enquiry ( here )