Motion to Substitute Counsel in Personal Injury and Insurance Claims
Written by
Jessica E
April 22, 2025 · 8 min read

Personal injury and insurance claims often involve intricate legal proceedings. During these cases, a need to change attorneys can arise, affecting the direction and success of the claim. This article explores the essentials of this legal procedure, shedding light on its purpose, the circumstances prompting it, and the legal basis supporting it.
What is a Motion to Substitute Counsel in Personal Injury and Insurance Claims?
A Motion to Substitute Counsel in personal injury and insurance claims is a formal court request to replace the current attorney with a new one. This legal step ensures the client’s case continues with representation that meets their needs. Filing this motion typically requires a written document explaining the change, followed by court approval. The process often involves agreement from the client and the incoming attorney, though requirements differ across jurisdictions. Legal writing services or a legal document writer can assist in drafting this motion accurately to comply with local rules.
Why Might a Substitution of Counsel Be Necessary in a Personal Injury Case?
A substitution of counsel might be necessary in a personal injury case due to various practical challenges. A breakdown in communication or trust between the client and attorney can stall progress, prompting the need for new representation. Conflicts of interest may emerge, compromising the attorney’s ability to act impartially. An attorney’s sudden illness or decision to retire can leave the client without proper support. Some clients seek lawyers with niche expertise, like handling complex insurance disputes, which their current counsel may lack. Disagreements over case strategy, such as settlement versus trial, can drive the switch too. Research from the American Bar Association in 2020 highlights that 35% of attorney-client disputes stem from communication issues, underscoring the frequency of these scenarios.
What Are the Legal Grounds for Filing a Motion to Substitute Counsel?
The legal grounds for filing a Motion to Substitute Counsel center on protecting the client’s right to competent representation. Mutual consent between the client and attorney often justifies the change, allowing a smooth transition. Dissatisfaction with the attorney’s performance, such as missed deadlines or poor advocacy, serves as another basis. An attorney’s withdrawal due to health issues or ethical conflicts provides valid grounds as well. Courts require approval to prevent delays or harm to the opposing party, balancing client autonomy with judicial efficiency. A 2019 study by the University of California’s Law Department found that 62% of approved motions cited performance issues. Clients can hire a legal writer or use legal drafting services to create lawyer papers that meet jurisdictional standards, ensuring a successful filing.
How to Write a Motion to Substitute Counsel in Personal Injury and Insurance Claims
A Motion to Substitute Counsel is a formal legal document used in personal injury and insurance claims to request the court’s permission to replace the current attorney with a new one. This might be necessary due to issues like poor communication, a conflict of interest, or other reasons that hinder effective representation. Here’s how to write it:
- Case Caption: Start with the court’s name, the parties involved (plaintiff and defendant), and the case number at the top of the document.
- Title: Clearly label it “Motion to Substitute Counsel” to state its purpose.
- Request Statement: Begin the body with a direct request, such as, “The undersigned moves this court to substitute [New Attorney’s Name] as counsel of record in place of [Current Attorney’s Name].”
- Reason for Substitution: Briefly explain why the change is needed. For example, “This substitution is requested due to a breakdown in communication between the client and current counsel.”
- Declaration or Affidavit: Include a signed statement from the client agreeing to the change and from the new attorney confirming their willingness to take over.
- Signatures: Both the client and the new attorney must sign the motion.
- Local Rules: Check the specific court’s rules, as some may require additional forms or details.
Keep the language clear and simple, avoiding legal jargon where possible.
How to File a Motion to Substitute Counsel in Court
Once the motion is written, filing it with the court involves a few key steps:
- Prepare the Motion: Ensure the document is complete, including all required signatures and attachments.
- Serve the Motion: Deliver copies to all parties involved in the case (e.g., the opposing counsel) to notify them of the request. This is typically done via mail or an approved electronic method, depending on court rules.
- File with the Court Clerk: Submit the original motion to the court clerk’s office, either in person or electronically, if allowed. The clerk will process it and add it to the case file.
- Hearing (if required): Some courts may schedule a hearing to review the motion. If so, the judge might ask questions to confirm the substitution is appropriate and won’t delay the case.
After filing, the court will notify you of its decision. If approved, the new attorney officially takes over.
What Are the Potential Costs of Substituting Counsel in a Claim?
Substituting counsel can involve several costs, which clients should consider:
- New Attorney Fees: The incoming attorney may charge an hourly rate or a contingency fee (a percentage of the settlement or judgment), depending on the agreement.
- File Transfer Costs: Expenses like copying documents or updating records may arise when transferring the case from the old attorney to the new one.
- Original Attorney Fees: The client typically must pay the current attorney for work done up to the substitution point. This could include hourly fees or a portion of a contingency fee if a settlement is pending.
- Court Fees: Some jurisdictions charge a filing fee for the motion, though this varies.
- Additional Expenses: Costs for drafting services or other administrative tasks might apply.
Clients should discuss these costs with both attorneys beforehand to avoid surprises. In some cases, the original attorney might place a lien on the case to secure payment, affecting the final settlement.
How Does a Motion to Substitute Counsel Impact an Insurance Claim?
A motion to substitute counsel can significantly impact an insurance claim by altering the legal strategy and potentially causing procedural delays. When a party changes attorneys, the new counsel may bring a different approach to the case. This could affect negotiations or litigation outcomes. For instance, a client might feel their current attorney isn’t effectively handling settlement talks with an insurance company. Substituting counsel could shift to a more aggressive or conciliatory strategy, influencing the claim’s trajectory and potentially leading to different settlement offers. Moreover, the substitution process can delay legal proceedings. Courts may reschedule hearings or extend deadlines, giving the new attorney time to review case files and prepare. These delays can extend the timeline for resolving the insurance claim, affecting when compensation or settlement is received.
What Role Does State Law Play in Substituting Counsel?
State law plays a crucial role in substituting counsel by setting the specific procedures and requirements to follow. Each state has its own rules for filing a motion to substitute counsel, covering documentation, notification to parties, and court approval. For example, California’s Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362, requires a formal motion with details like the reason for substitution and signatures from both attorneys when consent is given. Other states may have different forms or procedural steps. Failing to follow these state-specific rules can lead to the motion being denied or delayed, impacting the case. Parties must understand their state’s laws or consult a legal professional familiar with the jurisdiction to ensure compliance.
Where to Hire a Legal Writer to Draft a Motion to Substitute Counsel?
Hiring a legal writer to draft a motion to substitute counsel ensures the document meets court standards. Legal Writing Experts is the recommended service for this task. Their experienced team specializes in creating precise, high-quality legal documents tailored to your needs, making them the go-to choice for drafting such motions effectively.
What Are the Risks of Delaying a Motion to Substitute Counsel?
Delaying a Motion to Substitute Counsel can harm your case. If your current attorney is underperforming or there’s a conflict, waiting too long can lead to missed deadlines, inadequate preparation, or weakened legal arguments. Courts may also view delays unfavorably, potentially affecting their willingness to approve the substitution. Acting promptly minimizes these risks and protects your interests.
How Can Clients Ensure a Smooth Transition Between Attorneys?
Clients can ensure a smooth transition by taking these steps:
- Communicate Clearly: Inform both the outgoing and incoming attorneys of your decision early.
- Transfer Documents: Provide the new attorney with all case-related documents and information.
- Understand Fees: Clarify fee arrangements with both attorneys to avoid disputes.
- Monitor Progress: Stay involved to ensure the handover doesn’t delay your case.
These actions help maintain momentum and prevent disruptions.
What Are the Ethical Responsibilities During a Counsel Substitution?
Attorneys have key ethical duties during a substitution:
- Client’s Best Interest: Both attorneys must prioritize your case’s success.
- Cooperation: The outgoing attorney should assist the new attorney by sharing relevant case details.
- Confidentiality: Both must protect your private information.
- Avoid Conflicts: Neither attorney should have conflicts of interest that harm your case.
These responsibilities ensure the substitution doesn’t compromise your legal rights.
Meet the Author
Distinguished linguist at Legal Writing Experts
Jessica is an expert legal writer with a remarkable blend of legal knowledge and linguistic precision. She earned her Juris Doctor degree from Duke University, where she attended on a prestigious Law Faculty Merit Scholarship. At Duke, Jessica demonstrated her exceptional abilities by serving as an editor of the Duke Law Review.
After graduating, Jessica further refined her skills during a two-year appellate clerkship at a distinguished law firm in North Carolina. Throughout law school, she enhanced her research and writing expertise as a research assistant and writer for various legal firms. Jessica’s deep understanding of legal language and meticulous attention to detail make her an invaluable asset to our legal writing services.