Issue
Luke’s key dilemma is whether he should go ahead to compromise his own ethical believes over the moral obligations he has to his sibling, Owen. All his decisions in this matter will thus revolve around this point of compromise. On the off chance that Luke keeps his insight secret, and accordingly stays faithful to his organization, his sibling will endure. On the opposite side, if Luke reveals the data out of devotion to his sibling, he will, without a doubt, face results at work. Luke needs to pick the best choices.
Lens
Utilitarianism
Luke can rely on this theory to make a decision about the ethical dilemma facing him. The theory majorly focuses on the outcome of every decision and considers all decisions that yield greater good to be ethical. It focuses on the question of which option yields many benefits to those affected by any particular decision. For instance, in this situation, the two major parties that will be affected by Luke’s decision are his employer, ABC company, and his brother Owen. If he chooses to disclose the information to Owen, he will save him from a foreseeable financial loss. By so doing, however, Luke will be going against his employer’s ethical expectations of him. But the major question is, just how much loss is ABC likely to suffer as a result of this disclosure? If not as much loss as that Owen will suffer if Luke chooses to conceal the information, then it is not only rational for Luke to inform Owen but also his moral obligation to do so.
Universal Ethics
The Universal Ethics, or Categorical Imperative, approach expresses that an activity is just moral if it ought to be an all-inclusive law that everybody in every single comparable circumstance ought to follow constantly (Melé & Sánchez-Runde, 2013). In different words, it is just alright for Luke to uncover the improvement to Owen on the off chance that it is, in every case it is right for all representatives to uncover secret data constantly. The remarkable conditions of one circumstance can’t best the general moral necessities for every comparative circumstance.
By applying Universal Ethics to the situation examined over, Luke’s faithfulness to Owen isn’t thought of. We should just assess which one of Luke’s alternatives is generally moral. More, in particular, we ought to solicit what kind from a world it would be if all representatives shared data with their family members or companions to the detriment of their organizations? How could business be viably led every day in this sort of condition? Through this perspective, it is never moral for a representative to uncover secret data, in light of the fact that private data must be saved secret for specific organizations to work. In the event that workers didn’t regard their customer’s protection, the trust would separate. Additionally, Owen will encounter an insider’s preferred position over his neighbors by knowing this data, and that would not be reasonable for Owen’s neighbors. Then again, one can ask whether it is moral to keep data from one’s kin. Be that as it may, we have to take a gander at the circumstance all in all, which uncovers that it is increasingly moral to keep his customer data secret. Accordingly, there can be no exemptions.
On the off chance that Luke doesn’t educate Owen regarding the turn of events, Owen will be harmed monetarily and Owen and Luke’s relationship will endure. Notwithstanding, Luke’s situation with the organization will be strong, and there will be no negative ramifications for his associates in the event that he keeps his data secret. This choice would be the most moral choice if Luke esteems genuineness dependability, and being held in high respect at work.
The issue with settling on choices through the viewpoint of Virtue Ethics is that the meaning of being a decent individual can change individual to individual. It isn’t generally all inclusive. As in this situation, it relies upon what one needs for themselves. In this way, it makes it difficult for an outcast to pass judgment
the circumstance if that pariah doesn’t have the foggiest idea what is imperative to somebody at their center.
Golden rule
This rule points out that at any point in a decision, one should do unto others what they should have them to do them (Allen, 2014). Luke thus should ask himself how Owen could have gone through this situation if he was in Luke’s shoes or position. Let us look deeper into the situation, as presented.
In the event that Owen had information that could profit Luke, Luke might totally want to know it. Be that as it may, Luke may not have any desire to uncover this data in the event that he realized that by revealing it, Owen was putting his vocation at serious risk. Along these lines, it isn’t promptly clear if Luke telling his sibling the data is a moral choice, just thinking about the relationship with his sibling. Be that as it may, it is sensible to accept that if Owen was taking a gander at the circumstance through an unmistakable moral focal point, he would not need his sibling to hazard his business to profit him. Be that as it may, not every person sees the comprehensive view (Etzioni, 2016). It is conceivable that Luke isn’t moral and would need to realize the gainful data regardless of the circumstances.
In the event that we are to apply the Golden Rule with connection to his associates and clients, there is less uncertainty. On the off chance that one of Luke’s colleagues were to double-cross the classification of a client to help their sibling, Luke would be frustrated. Consequently, Luke ought not do that to his colleagues.
Likewise, if Luke were the client of firm whose delegate didn’t keep Luke’s data private, Luke would be similarly disillusioned. Thusly, Luke ought not treat his clients that way.
The Golden Rule is extraordinary to consider when one has numerous choices to make in a bustling today. It is a “fast and-simple” way to deal with a moral predicament. It can reliably be called upon in most circumstances. In any case, the Golden Rule additionally has its issues. To start with, it accept that everybody will act morally and legitimately, individuals don’t generally act morally and coherently. Second, the Golden Rule accept that others need to be dealt with a similar way that they need to be dealt with. Be that as it may, individuals’ belief system doesn’t generally coordinate. Now and again, individuals keep up a thin desire of how everybody should act. Third, the Golden Rule expects one to place themselves in another’s shoes. This isn’t generally viable as individuals frequently experience difficulty seeing other’s viewpoint. In a case this way, the Golden Rule doesn’t work essentially.
Virtue Ethics
Another moral focal point Luke can utilize when arriving at a choice is Virtue Ethics. This asks, “what sort of individual would I like to be?” It is a perspective about how to carry on such that one believes correct (Kruckeberg,2013). For this situation, Luke can inquire as to whether he needs to be completely forthright and dependable to his customer, associates, and boss or in the event that he needs to be a reliable sibling. Educating Owen concerning the advancement will support Owen, and Luke can see himself as a “great” sibling. In any case, he is uncovering classified data will, without a doubt, cause Luke to be taken a gander at in a negative light with his organization and their clients. What’s more, Luke’s chief, the organization’s proprietorship, and different workers could confront negative outcomes from this choice. Be that as it may if Luke esteems devotion to his sibling and considers “blood thicker than water,” at that point, advising Owen is the correct activity.
Analysis/Conclusion
Dissecting the circumstance through the viewpoint of Utilitarianism, a lot more individuals will endure negative outcomes if Luke uncovers this data. This would incorporate Luke’s associates, customers, what’s more, Owen’s neighbors. In the event that Luke keeps the data secret, just Owen endures. What’s more, applying Universal Ethics likewise infers that Luke should keep the turn of events classified until the open declaration. Prudence Ethics emotional for this situation, and we don’t recognize what is imperative to Luke. In this way, Virtue Ethics could legitimize either position. As far as the golden rule is concerned, Luke should act out of his won moral obligations and believes. Most likely, his choices should be informed by is own expectations of Owen if the tables were to be turned. Utilitarianism, on the other hand, focuses on the results that Luke’s choice is likely to have, both to Owen and the ABC. In my analysis, I borrowed heavily from this theory despite the fact that Owen’s expectations are the exact opposite of the ABC company’s expectations to look to keep the information confidential.
References
Allen, C. (2014). What’s wrong with the golden rule’? Conundrums of conducting ethical research in cyberspace. The Information Society, 12(2), 175-188.
Etzioni, A. (2016). The new golden rule (pp. xix-15). HarperCollins Publishers.
Kruckeberg, D. (2013). Universal ethics code: Both possible and feasible. Public Relations Review, 19(1), 21-31.
Melé, D., & Sánchez-Runde, C. (2013). Cultural diversity and universal ethics in a global world.
At Legal writing experts, we would be happy to assist in preparing any legal document you need. We are international lawyers and attorneys with significant experience in legal drafting, Commercial-Corporate practice and consulting. In the last few years, we have successfully undertaken similar assignments for clients from different jurisdictions. If given this opportunity, The LegalPen will be able to prepare the legal document within the shortest time possible. You can send us your quick enquiry ( here )