DEFENDANTS MOTION TOTERMINATE

This Motion is made pursuant to Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 430.50 ( i ) improper Notice andunverified Petitions, which is prejudicial and misleading; ( ii ) the Court lacks jurisdiction over thechildren; ( iii ) the case is beyond the Statutory limitation period; and ( iv...

Corporate Laws vis a vis Employees Rights

Corporate Laws vis a vis Employees’ Rights Name Course Title Professor’s Name  School Name Corporate Laws vis a vis Employees’ Rights      The operation of companies in the US is vertically governed by corporate laws. (Romano, R. 1993). These are sets of legislations...

COMPLAINANTS REBUTTAL

Jessica Ehlers [Enter Address] [ENTER DATE] Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Attn: Cherie A. Doak 330 South Second Avenue, Suite 720 Minneapolis, MN 55415 RE:  COMPLAINANT’S REBUTTAL TO RESPONDENT’S POSITION STATEMENT Dear Ms. Doak, INTRODUCTION This case is...

NOTICE OF MOTION

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXPetitioners, In Pro Per XXX BANKRUPTCY COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT STATE OF XXXIn RE:XXX  & XXX Debtors XXX,  and XXXPlaintiffs XXX & XXXDefendants Adv. Case # XXXBK Case No: XXXChapter 7 NOTICE OF MOTION ; PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY...

Declaration of Plaintiffs

Teena Colebrook 3940 S. Broad Street #7258 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 310-420-0508 Email: tc4gold@gmail.com Teena Colebrook, Richard Viar, Colleen Craig, and Kevin Rock Petitioners, In Pro Per UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT STATE OF CALIFORNIA In RE:...