Esther Tendo Atam
13621 Arcturus Ave.
Gardena, CA 90249
Plaintiff in Pro Per
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
ESTTHER ATAM,
Plaintiff vs. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ET AL.,
Defendants |
Case No.: 21STCV41538 [Related to Case no. 22STCV37929]
Assigned for all purposes to Hon. Michael Small, Department 57
DECLARATION IN RESPONSE TO ORDER STRIKING VERIFIED STATEMENTS
|
I ESTHER ATAM, declare the following:
- I am the Plaintiff in this case.
- I am over eighteen years old.
- I am of sound mind.
- I am therefore competent to swear on the matters said herein.
- I write this declaration in response to the Court’s Order Striking Verified Statements.
- Judge Small, as an officer of the Court, is expected to be forefront in protecting the rights of litigants that seek justice in Courts. However, Judge Small has blatantly disregarded his role as a custodian of the law.
- He has neglected his solemn duty as a judge, and should therefore be disqualified. The judiciary should be free of such unworthy and corrupt judicial officers.
- Judge Small is confused. His conduct throughout the proceeding of the case shows his confusion and incompetence.
- The judge issued a frivolous order against my request to have him disqualified from my case. I had made the request to have him disqualified under section 170.6. Judge Small answered the said peremptory challenge under 170.6. However, in the Judge’s Order, he assumed that my motion was made under 170.3. and then went on to make his arguments pursuant to 170.3.
- I then used the Judge’s answer as evidence, to file a statement of disqualification for cause, under 170.3. Judge Small did not provide a verified answer in response to the statement. Further, his order to strike verified statement was beyond the required 10 days. It is a requirement for the judge to strike the statement within the 10-day period prescribed in section 170.3, subdivision (c)(3) for filing an answer. Thereafter, the judge is deemed disqualified and has no power to act in the case. Lewis v. Superior Court (1988) 198 Cal.App.3d 1101, 1104 [ 244 Cal.Rptr. 328].
- Plaintiff asserts that nothing precluded her from filing her second Statement.
- Judge Small’s confusion is also evident where he has completely neglected the course of justice and is clearly supporting the bad faith conduct of the Defendant. For instance, he has failed to sanction Defendant for impeding my efforts to prosecute the case, including filing frivolous and bad faith motions/filings against me.
- The foregoing clearly show how Judge Small is confused and is using his position to manipulate, bully, and threaten me.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
Dated: _________________
__________________________
ESTHER TENDO ATAM
Plaintiff, in Pro Per
State of California County of _______________
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this ______ day of _____________, 20___, by _______________________ ___________________________________________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me.
(Seal) Signature______________________
At Legal writing experts, we would be happy to assist in preparing any legal document you need. We are international lawyers and attorneys with significant experience in legal drafting, Commercial-Corporate practice and consulting. In the last few years, we have successfully undertaken similar assignments for clients from different jurisdictions. If given this opportunity, The LegalPen will be able to prepare the legal document within the shortest time possible. You can send us your quick enquiry ( here )